Whilst I support the development of affordable housing in the town, I am concerned that this particular proposal has substantial flaws, as follows.
Overdevelopment. The Vision 2031
document for Bury St Edmunds shows the whole School Yard area as 0.64 ha with an
indicative capacity of 32 dwellings. The area boarded off represents about a
quarter of this, or 8 dwellings. (The application states that it is less: 0.13
ha, or 6.5 dwellings.) Even at 8 dwellings, if they equate to three times as
many flats, this would represent 24, i.e. 5 fewer. Overdevelopment, with all the
attendant parking, noise and disturbance resulting from overuse, is therefore a
major concern and relevant objection.
2 Parking. As these will be
affordable (not social) rents, many of the 72 occupants are likely to be able to
run cars, some because they work well away from home. There is nowhere provided
for them or their visitors to park, and this will cause chaotic and further
illegal parking and misuse of the Nelson Rd permit scheme. Policy DM 46
applies.
3 Loss of
light/overshadowing. Due to the height
of the Nelson Road block, this will particularly affect numbers 19, 20 and 21
Nelson Rd.
4
Conservation
issues. Apart from the
overall size and massing of this proposal being out of keeping with the
conservation area, the destruction of both the plum trees and the hedge fronting
the site will be a conservation loss. Policy DM 18 applies.
I suggest that a
scaled down version of this application, with fewer flats, more space (including
for cars) a lower height on Nelson road and the retention of the plum trees and
hedge, would all be a considerable improvement.
No comments:
Post a Comment